We are in a global pandemic far worse, and far more dangerous, than the Covid19 pandemic.
This pandemic could be called The Cult of Victimhood (or, The Loss of our Humanity).
There have been signs simmering under the surface of society for a few years; since 2020, these have bubbled ever closer to the edge until, with the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the deadly virus boiled over into society’s consciousness.
This virus has bred a society of victims who celebrate the death of an elder, a woman so old that there are 101 years between the birth of her first Prime Minister and her last.
One hundred and one years. Think about that for a moment.
How can any of us born in this modern era know or understand the personal
cost she paid to meet the demands of a Head of State in an era that spanned an
unprecedented amount of social change?
Prejudice is a race-less, gender-less and faith-less human condition and thus every human being, regardless of our race, gender or faith, possesses the capacity to be blind to our own inviolable prejudices. Those who are unable to separate the woman from the symbolism of Queen to the
extent that in her final hours wish her “excruciating pain” or who celebrate her
death are as prejudiced as the worst colonisers human history has seen.
I began to lose hope in the ultimate goodness of humanity in 2016, when Trump was elected President. Now, with the vicious, and at times downright evil, rants surrounding Queen Elizabeth II’s death, I fear humanity is entering a collective dark night of the soul. We have never been closer to the abyss that irrevocably separates good from evil.
The moral debates around the collective’s past norms must and should continue: slavery; colonialism; reparation; economic, gender and race inequalities — there is still so much that needs to be addressed before each of us can live up to our highest potentials as unique individuals contributing to the greater good of all. We are not free from suffering until all of us are free.
But one of the dangerous side-effects of this cult-of-victimhood virus is a sense of entitlement that justifies a rage allowing no other suffering and pain except one’s own to be heard.
Is this brave new world, this world that iconic figures such as Martin Luther King Jr dreamed would be a place where people are not “judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character”, merely the flip side of the old world with a new kind of “vicious racist” that by their very nature create, in turn, new injustices in an attempt to redress centuries-old injustices of an outdated and flawed system that perpetrated unspeakable cruelties against humanity?
The vindictive behaviour of so many on the death of Queen Elizabeth II begs the question: are we as a species any more civilised than those blood-thirsty crowds baying for blood as gladiators clashed in the Colosseum? Are we any kinder than Shaka, that most powerful of Zulu Kings who, on the death of his mother, was so filled with grief that he ordered any woman who became pregnant to be executed along with her husband and unborn child?
Surely, surely, in the name of our humanity, this necessary narrative on how to create a better world for all could have been suspended to acknowledge the decades-long personal sacrifice and effort of a young woman who did her best to serve her country and her peoples under the accepted norms of the day?
Just as no-one consciously chooses to be born into slavery or poverty, or black or white, or male or female, the Queen did not consciously choose the role that was thrust upon her at the young age of 25. Yet, two days before her death at age 96, and seriously ill, she held steady and performed her final state duty with a smile on her face.
There is nothing humane, or just, about the appalling viciousness of Prof Uju Anya’s tweet, or the EFF’s official statement on the Queen’s death, or Irish football fans or Irish ex-pats celebration during Queen Elizabeth II’s final days and death. Professor Anya is in the position to mould the minds of her young students; the EFF is an influential opposition political party.
What kind of world is their prejudice, anger and hatred going to create? It's worth considering that history shows us, while King Shaka’s pain and suffering were no doubt the root of his cruel actions, that moment of savagery led to his downfall.
To those who, like the self-styled “anti-racist” Professor Anya, try to justify their cruel and merciless behaviour as “fair and just” because of the history of what the Queen symbolised, I ask this: if, with retrospective moral judgement, you condemn individuals who lived to their highest potential within a system that, when it existed, did not know it was horribly flawed by present day moral standards, how will a more evolved future society judge your actions around the suffering and death of another human being?
Under the categorial imperative of moral rectitude, what is unjust when done to you, is also unjust when done by you. Nelson Mandela intuitively understood this. Despite his suffering, despite his humiliation, he rose above his pain and was able to separate the role of apartheid jailer on Robben Island from the man Christo Brand, and an unlikely friendship was forged.
How much more powerful it is to bring about the changes you want in the world through love rather than through a hatred that leaves no place for our common humanity!
To those who danced at the Queen’s passing, I leave you to consider the words of my late husband’s mentor and friend, Judge Bernard Makgabo Ngoepe. In his recently published memoir, Rich Pickings Out of the Past [Juta Law, 2022], the Judge says “How did we, as humans, reach a point where the [death] of a head of state, a fellow human being, became a cause for celebration? …for change to occur we foolishly tend to embark on ways that will inevitably lead to our demise.”
When future generations, still wounded and in pain from aeons of cyclical ancestral pain and suffering, look back on how our society responded to the death of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor, an elderly woman — a human being — who also happened to be called Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, what will they think of the loss of our humanity?
NOTE: King Charles III has been an advocate for climate change and an environmental activist since the early 1970’s. In 1975, the King established the Prince’s Trust, which has helped more than one million young people of all races, genders and faiths improve their lives. Long may his work continue. #GodSaveTheKing
***
